Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 03/15/2025 in Posts

  1. For remakes, we already don't list neither the original developers nor the original publisher in the infobox as remakes don't share code with the original games. For remasters, we list the original developers because remasters are improved (at least on paper) versions of games that keep the same core under the hood, but we don't list the original publisher. For games that are the exact same product but just, for example, change publisher in their digital forms or receive a post launch update from a different dev team, we list all. I truly believe this is already the best way to handle the infobox and i don't think any change to this modus operandi is needed.
    3 points
  2. Hello, I've been a member of this wiki for a long time. I've always thought this wiki is very helpful, often containing tips, tricks and workarounds for various games. But something is missing. I realized today when my friend was unable to get "The Isle" working and I was curious what version of C++ / .NET it needs to run that this wiki does not contain the information pertaining to which versions the game requires. This would greatly improve the ease of troubleshooting (Repairing/Reinstalling the required libraries) when figuring out why a game is crashing when all other requirements are met. So, I think it'd be cool if we just updated the wiki for all games under system requirements to include: C++ Redistributable Required: YYYY .NET Framework Required: YYYY Additionally, I know we place the "Minimum System Requirements" and "Recommended System Requirements" where the developers place them, but I think we can do better - as theirs is usually a rough estimate.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...