Blackbird 54 Share Posted August 19, 2017 But that game is horrible port. It still runs terribly even today. It's not "I have 10 year old PC and it runs bad". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mars icecream 57 Author Share Posted August 19, 2017 But that game is horrible port. It still runs terribly even today. It's not "I have 10 year old PC and it runs bad". Well, at least the keypoint starts with "Reports indicate". When reliable sources are provided, perhaps this keypoint can be used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waschbär 3 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Sorry to bump this topic back up but I'm interested to hear some opinions on this. In the case of AC: Origins, the game has a good amount of settings (which isn't a good key point as was discussed here) but also visually displays the differences (see https://youtu.be/AjbbuWMR94A?t=877). Very hand in my opinion and haven't seen it very often yet. It also includes a benchmark which on same pages is already a ++ point. So I guess putting both points in one combined line would be acceptable? But then there is the case of COD:WWII (see https://youtu.be/x3llyXsUTKI?t=52) Pretty much the same thing but no benchmark this time. So would just the visualization of the graphics settings alone be worth a positive key point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pridit 39 Share Posted February 16, 2018 For comparisons we'd be using our own PC Reports, where available. This is biased, but I wouldn't recommend featuring YouTube videos from others as part of our articles, regardless of the content. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pridit 39 Share Posted February 16, 2018 [Automated] This discussion has concluded and a verdict has been reached. If this is not the case and there are still matters left undiscussed please contact a member of staff to get the topic reinstated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts