Jump to content
mrrobertman

Proposal: Show support for Steam Family Sharing

Recommended Posts

Yes this is a good idea, we should wikify this list of games.

In terms of template position, perhaps it could fit in a new 'platform features' with 'achievements' section as proposed here? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking more along the lines of using the Store feature template as like how it is currently used to denote a game being part of Xbox game pass/play anywhere and be put inside the availability notes table. 

Not that I disagree with the idea of putting it in it's own table as it would also give more merit as it would solve both proposals, but I happened to come across an old proposal form 2019 for the inclusion of a property for Xbox game pass/play anywhere, and it too had an idea for its own table made by @Aemony, that I assume was never used. Due to the similarities between the two (or three) ideas I would call into question the need for a seperate table, though maybe it could also be seen as an opportunity to finally use it?

I've also discussed on Discord how there is the potential for this to be automated using a bot, as SteamDB has the game property "exfgls" to denote if a game is excluded from family game library sharing or not. Though it would still need to be decided how to display this first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Andytizer said:

Yes this is a good idea, we should wikify this list of games.

In terms of template position, perhaps it could fit in a new 'platform features' with 'achievements' section as proposed here?

Platform features could work for this, the only potential issue I see is that family sharing is only available on Steam (I don't believe any other platform has an equivalent) so the check would only ever appear next to Steam, and every other platform would always show the X. If that's no issue, then platform features does seems like the perfect place to display this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

  • Found PCGamingWiki useful? Please consider making a Donation or visiting our Patreon.
  • Similar Content

    • By dave247
      This is follow on from my post on the Special K Steam Discussions, but expanded to include other third party tools such as Re:shade.
      Link to Steam Discussion thread: https://steamcommunity.com/app/1157970/discussions/0/2650881941771332222/
      Reply from: @Aemony
       
    • By SirYodaJedi
      This seems like an important setting, especially with the prominence of high-PPI UHD monitors.
       
      True: Has option to change scaling settings. May or may not automatically scale based on selected resolution. Example: SWTOR
      Always on: Is automatically scaled based on resolution, but has no manual setting. Example: Lego Star Wars: The Complete Saga
      Limited: Only scales certain elements (ex: graphics but not text), or cannot be scaled beyond a certain percentage of the base resolution. Example: Half-Life 2
      False: Is not scaled and does not have an option to scale. Can't think of an example off the top of my head.
      Hackable: Hackable. Example: Quake
       
      This could go in the video settings table, or it could go in a potential accessibility table. I think probably wait until a dedicated accessibility table is made and put any info in 4K for now.
    • By Andytizer
      In the beginning, PCGamingWiki shied away from including classification of games because we were focused only on fixes - we weren't interested if a game was a 'third person shooter' or a 'first person shooter' - we just wanted FOV fixes, widescreen fixes, etc.   However I think things could be improved - taking a queue from Wikipedia:   Modes: Firstly with the way the tables work, some genres don't require 'FOV' fixes for example 2D games. Or an 90s adventure game doesn't need an 'Inverted Y-Axis' option etc. A mode property would allow us to restrict certain tables so that this makes more sense. This would include things like: VR, 2D, 3D, 1st person, 3rd person, touchscreen, VR etc. Furthermore, in the future we could use this to categorise other features like microtransactions, lootboxes etc.   Genres: Genres are a great way of listing games. We could make lists of Puzzle games on Uplay, RPGs fan translated into Russian, etc. How great would it be to see all the Local co-op games that are 2D rather than 3D (my wife can't play 3D games as she gets motion sick!).      In terms of implementation, this could sit in the proposed Overview section as well as the Infobox itself.
    • By SirYodaJedi
      Example of where it would be useful: https://pcgamingwiki.com/w/index.php?title=The_Elder_Scrolls_III%3A_Morrowind&type=revision&diff=716310&oldid=716303
    • By Andytizer
      Reviews are a very important part of 'discovery' of what game to play. How much more useful would our lists be if we could filter or sort by Metacritic score? 
      Metacritic includes the Critic score which tends to be fairly static after release.
      There is also the User Score which tends to fluctuate a lot, even years after release, or is subject to review bombing.
      I would be happy to include both.
      Potentially, Metacritic scores would sit inside the Infobox, with a link directly to the relevant Metacritic page. 
      The values themselves could be gleaned from Wikidata, or another automated method, or could be entered manually.
      I am also open to alternative review aggregators and am open to suggestions.
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 222 Guests (See full list)

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    1,409
    Total Topics
    7,622
    Total Posts
×
×
  • Create New...