Suicide machine

ZZZzzZZZzzzZZzzzzzzz Just let Windows 7 die in peace with it having pretty much a killdate set up... since it's pretty much the only way Microsoft can "convince" people nowadays. Even if it's all true, difference is really not that "huge" and making a note "upgrade to Windows 10" is not a solution, either.

Since, I just got "corrected", I think it'd be a nice time to bring another matter - forcing settings from a level of graphics drivers. At the moment, if there is a case, where some setting can be forced from the level of graphical drivers (namely Vsync, Anisotropic Filtering or Anti-aliasing), most of pages tend to mark it as hackable. There are however also pages, that mark it as false - which, is actually what I personally prefer. However, as much as I like marking them as false (yup!), I feel like this is something we need to standardize. I'm not sure, if this is something that requires a poll - depends. So, if a setting can be forced from the graphics drivers panel, should it be hackable or false? Why? Whatever the result is - this leads me to a second problem. We should have a page with screenshots of Graphical Drivers Panels (Intel, AMD and nVidia) - unless we have something like this, already - in which case, I can't find it. Anyway, knowing how much less reliable forcing settings Catalyst Panel is, comparing to Nvidia's Control Panel - we should have informations about alternatives like RadeonPro in that page. Then we could (and should) make links from every note that states it can be forced from graphical drivers panel to such page. Answering my questions and why I'd prefer false? Mainly because nearly every game can have these settings forced - which gives us a lot of hackable (not a very good reason, I know). And if a setting can be forced from a level of graphics drivers - one may ask, then what's the point in writing about how to edit config files of a game or enable a console and type something in it, etc. if most often than not - these solutions are more complicated than simply forcing one setting. Yes, I've seen multiple times on a forum of Thief, System Shock 2 and Dark Souls - how forced settings cause problems, but that won't stop anyone from trying them anyway. So my thought about it, would be to mark them as false and state in notes they can be forced from a level of graphics drivers. If not - hackable and same note will do.

Added an override, so the Lists should now be above Summery text box.

I guess it'd be nice for it to take 100% of designated space. Also if there is issue with columns being equally wide, it'd be nice to specify them as well, but see what happens after you set it to 100% width.

I've seen fixes, which made less sense that worked.

Sui does N/A - Sui must be right. Right?

No. --EDIT-- Fine. Since I was nicely asked to explain myself. No I don't agree with removing it. WSGF have a bit of a different standards for their grading and it does provides most of the times more in-depth information, with proper screenshot comparison. It is also ~16% of space of table space. Which on 1080p monitor, is not a big deal, when you consider there is 560px between the table and the screenshot. If anything, I'd agree on some rules regarding to not displaying some parts of WSGF (and maybe even elements like Ultra-widescreen / 4K Ultra HD) if there is no information. The full row of wsgf incomplete should not ever be displayed, though.